Clinicians’ experiences of obtaining informed consent for research and treatment: a nested qualitative study from Pakistan
by Memon, R et al.‘What Do I Know? Should I Participate?’ Considerations on Participation in HIV Related Research among HIV Infected Adults in Bangalore, South India
by Rodrigues R J et al.Comparison of group counseling with individual counseling in the comprehension of informed consent: a randomized controlled trial
by Sarkar R et al.Co-designing the consent process of critical care trials with patients and the public: Project protocol
by Tolppa, T et al.What empirical research has been undertaken on the ethics of clinical research in India? A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis.
by Paramasivan, S et al.Trials Methodology Research: what is it and why should India invest in it?
by Paramasivan, S et al.Developing Standards for Rapid Evaluation and Appraisal Methods (STREAM): An e-Delphi Consensus Study
by Sigrún Eyrúnardóttir Clark, Norha Vera San Juan, Cecilia Vindrola-PadrosGlobal health trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
by Rosala-Hallas A, et al.The Global Health Trials Methodology Research Agenda: A Priority Setting Exercise
by The Editorial TeamThe following invitation to take part in trials methodology research comes from the Network of Hubs for Trials Methodology Research (HTMR) which was established by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) to improve the quality of clinical trials.
Professor Mike English explains how KEMRI-Wellcome are ''working with government to generate patient level data from a network of Kenyan hospitals as a platform for research'.
Evaluating Clinical Trial Designs for Investigational Treatments of Ebola Virus Disease
by The Editorial TeamThis article published in PLOS Medicine on April 14th, 2015 discusses how best to test Ebola treatment.
Systematic reviews on selected nutrition interventions: descriptive assessment of conduct and methodological challenges
by rehanasalamRigorous and transparent systematic reviews are recognized internationally as a credible source for evidence of effectiveness. However, in the field of nutrition, despite attempts at developing consensus on actions and interventions to reduce undernutrition and micronutrient deficiencies, there is lack of coordination among various groups. Each of these methodological choices influences the findings of the reviews, and lack of standardization across these domains increases the complexity for users of systematic reviews in interpreting results. There is a need to develop a consensus on methodologies for nutrition reviews, criteria for assessing the evidence and possibly facilitating development and collation of the evidence in the subject area.